Upload three columns — supplier name, site country, annual spend — and Tieron returns a ranked SAQ wave: country risk and sector risk from public reference data, sanctions/UFLPA screening, and an Impact × Risk ranking you can put in front of an auditor. Built for UFLPA and CSDDD programs that have to defend every targeting decision.
Most teams pick SAQ recipients by spend descending, or by gut. When an auditor — or your board — asks “why these suppliers?”, spend-only targeting has no answer for the $80k plating shop in a high-risk corridor.
| SUPPLIER | SITE | SPEND | CTRY | SECT | TOTAL | DECISION |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hoshine Silicon Industry | CN | $0.8M | 72.3 | 84.7 | 75.0 | UFLPA · wave 1 |
| Suzhou Hemei Materials | CN | $6.5M | 72.3 | 80.0 | 77.4 | Wave 1 |
| Towa Precision Industry | JP | $12.3M | 27.6 | 55.5 | 44.8 | Wave 2 |
| Feinwerk Stuttgart | DE | $5.1M | 15.2 | 55.5 | 40.3 | Monitor |
Impact and risk are weighed together, so a huge but low-risk supplier doesn’t crowd out the small supplier in a sanctioned corridor. When someone asks “why these 200?”, every selection carries its receipts — and weights are adjustable when your program weighs human-rights exposure differently from continuity risk.
Every score expands to factor × weight × source, per supplier — the export attaches straight to your approval doc. See a full breakdown →
Targeting is step one. The same selection becomes an assessment campaign — and every response makes your data better and the network bigger.
Not ready to rank the whole list? Paste any set of supplier names and screen them against sanctions and UFLPA lists in seconds — no account, nothing stored.
Tieron is built by the team mapping Japan-Asia supply-chain data — the tier-2 coverage US tools don’t have. Targeting and the SAQ loop (invite → respond → measured scores) are live; supplier network mapping ships next.
UFLPA additions and sanctions updates land without warning. Get a short note when the lists change in ways that matter for screening.