Paste supplier names — one per line, optional second column for country — and get an instant match report against OFAC SDN, BIS Entity List, EU, UK, and the UFLPA Entity List. Free, no account needed.
Names are matched server-side and not stored. Up to 2,000 per run.
Get sanctions & UFLPA list updates
A short note when the lists change in ways that matter for supply-chain screening. No noise.
Matching is name-based with normalization (legal forms, character width, traditional / simplified Chinese) and is a screening aid, not a legal determination. Always verify a match against the primary source list before acting. The source lists publish mostly romanized names, so include a romanized name for Chinese suppliers for best coverage. Data: OpenSanctions consolidated sanctions + UFLPA Entity List, snapshot 2026-08-03.
What this screens against
One snapshot, merged from the consolidated screening lists of eight issuing authorities and rebuilt weekly — the copy behind this page was built on 2026-08-03. It covers 24,363 organizations in the sanctions category alone, plus forced-labour, debarment and regulatory entries, which is why a name can come back flagged without being sanctioned.
SOURCE LISTS
US OFAC Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List — asset freeze; US persons barred from dealing
US Trade Consolidated Screening List (CSL) — the Commerce, State and Treasury restricted-party lists in one
US SAM Procurement Exclusions — debarred from US federal contracting
EU Council Official Journal sanctioned entities — EU restrictive measures
UK FCDO Sanctions List — UK financial and trade sanctions
Ukraine NSDC State Register of Sanctions — Ukrainian national sanctions
Swiss SECO Sanctions/Embargoes — Swiss measures, which do not always mirror the EU's
Taiwan Strategic High-Tech Commodities Entity List — export-control end-user concerns
Four kinds of finding, which are not the same thing
A screening result that collapses everything into “hit” makes the next decision harder, not easier. Findings are separated because the obligations behind them are different: sanctions is a legal prohibition on dealing; UFLPA is a rebuttable presumption that goods are barred from US import — including goods that merely contain inputs from a listed entity, which is why an intermediary does not remove the exposure; debarment excludes a supplier from public contracting without prohibiting private trade; regulatory is a flag on the record, not a bar. Browse the 144 companies on the UFLPA Entity List or the sanctions entity directory to see what an individual listing carries.
Why names are hard, and what this does about it
A supplier list almost never spells a company the way its sanctions listing does. 株式会社, GmbH, OOO and Tovarystvo z obmezhenoiu vidpovidalnistiu are the same idea in four scripts, and a matcher that only knows the abbreviations misses the spelled-out forms. Names are normalized for the legal form in every script the lists use, and matching weights a shared word by how rare it is, so Beijing counts for far less than the distinctive part of a name. Matches above the confidence threshold are returned as hits; the band below it is returned as needs review, with the listed name beside yours. Uncertain matches are shown rather than dropped, because a screening tool that reports only what it is sure of is reporting its confidence, not your exposure.
What it does not attempt: ownership traversal. A subsidiary of a listed entity is not flagged by name matching alone, and no name matcher should claim otherwise.
Questions people ask before they paste a list
Is it free, and do I need an account?
Free, and no. Paste names and screen them. An account only matters if you want the result to persist or to be re-screened when the lists change.
How current is the data?
The snapshot rebuilds weekly and the date it was built is shown in the header of this page, so you can see exactly what you screened against rather than trusting that it was recent.
How many suppliers can I screen at once?
Up to 2,000 names per run. Two columns are accepted — name and country — and the country narrows a match rather than deciding it.
What happens to the list I paste?
Name matching runs server-side and the names are not stored. Spend figures and supplier lists uploaded elsewhere in Tieron are private tenant data and are never rendered on a public page.
Why does a result say “needs review” instead of yes or no?
Because for that name it is genuinely uncertain. Company names transliterate, abbreviate and get renamed, so a screening tool that answers only yes or no is hiding its own error rate. Uncertain matches are surfaced with the listed name beside yours, for a human to settle.
Is a match a legal conclusion?
No. It is an informational aid for supplier screening. Verify against the official list of the issuing authority before acting on it — the entity pages link to the authority for exactly this reason.
Screening tells you who is listed. It does not tell you which of your suppliers to look at first — that needs your spend and where the work happens.Rank my supplier list →